Diskussionen

• baschny Core Developer

  +5

  I am not sure that this is meant to be a "discussion forum". Of course we have to evaluate how we will want to use this platform first by gaining some experience, but I would rather recommend that proposals cannot be a set of "questions to be discussed" but should be a concrete proposal that needs legitimation. We have "enough" discussion platforms already, and this should not be "just one more platform for discussing".

  But for us to know how to use the features we need of course first to experiment with them and learn the terms and "how-to" work with them.

  So a "draft" like Robert's "Leadership" Document would be a candidate for a "proposal" which for a consensus could be put up for legitimation through this platform (instead of collecting "+1" through the mailing lists.

  I would think of this platform as a "Gerrit for non code-related decisions".

  7. März 2012 18:18 bearbeitet · Historie · melden

  • tolleiv Core Developer

    +1

    Right ... just wanted to write something and that was the only stuff I could think of ;)

    7. März 2012 19:12 · melden

    • francois Core Developer

      +1

      Well, it was good to write this down somewhere anyway ;-) but I agree with Ernesto's statement.

      8. März 2012 17:40 · melden

• Joey ist dafür

  +1

  Exactly - this is NOT a discussion forum, but a voting tool that gives you the opportunity to explain your votes - discussions should still happen on the appropriate lists.

  But the voting doesn't seem to work correctly - I voted in favour but the result is still 0:1

  9. März 2012 10:48 bearbeitet · Historie · melden